Deepak Goyal Profile Page
 |
| 2678 | |
| 2 years ago | |
| 9 hours ago | |
| 7 months ago | |
| 2 | |
Senior Boarder |
|
 298 |
My Tweets
Profile Activities
21 February, 2010
 , 18:47 - Comment |
4 February, 2010
 , 06:58 - Comment |
, 06:48 - Comment |
, 06:38 - Comment |
, 05:54 - Comment |
, 05:45 - Comment |
24 December, 2009
, 08:14 - Comment |
22 December, 2009
 - Comment |
6 October, 2009
, 18:25 - Comment |
My Comments
| Setting-up of A Diagnostic Centre: Part II |
| This is a novel write-up. Nobody in your MD or Senior Residency period tells you anything about how to setup your own diagnostic centre. I think Medical Colleges/Institutes should organise lectures by owners of private diagnostic centres which would greatly help beginers. |
| When do you leave? |
| I am myself facing this dillema. It is a very thought provoking debate. We are taught from our childhood days that money is not important; and we should not base our life's decisions based solely on money. But as we face the real world, we come to know that money IS important. But professional satisfaction is a totally cup of tea.And ironey of life is that both don't come together!! |
| Behind my back |
| Respected RR sir, I am your fan since the time I attended REF course. I like your idealism. It inspires me. |
| The Art and Science of Reporting in Radiology: Part 3 |
| Hi, This is a nice write up, but I would like to differ on some points. 1. I prefer to write "Both kidneys appear normal in size and echotexture. The corticomedullary differentiation is maintained. The margins are smooth. There is no evidence of calculus or hydronephrosis" rather than "The kidneys appear normal" and I think MD students MUST write in detail because unless one writes specifically, one tends to ignore/overlook certain points. Plus MD students need to know what all things points they need to check. 2. To me "Comparison is made with the CT dated 12/08/07. The low attenuation lesion in segment 7 of the liver is seen again, and has not changed in size since the previous study." makes more sense than merely "Compared with the CT dated 12/08/07, there is no significant interval change." because a lesion can not only change in size over a time period, but it can change in character also e. g it may turn malignant i.e its enhancement patterns may change. Therefore we need to be specific. 3. Unless one makes it a habit to measure, one can easily miss/overlook findings a number of times e.g one can overlook hepatomegaly. Measurements also help to assess the response to therapy and when the investigation is repeated over an interval of time, we can say an organ has enlarged or regressed only when measurements have been provided in the previous report. 4. To me Lymphadenopathy means enlarged lymph nodes and enlargment is a pathology. The cause may reactive, infective or malignant. 5. For me "The findings are suggestive of pneumonic consolidation, but a bronchoalevolar carcinoma cannot be excluded." has a different meaning than saying, "Although the features are suggestive of pneumonia, bronchoalevolar carcinoma should also be considered in the differential.". I would rather prefer writing it the first way. |
| To Err is Human: part 4 |
| Hello Dr Keshav Very well written and informative article! One thing I would like to add is that one should never do the TNM staging of any "mass" before the FNAC/biopsy report. Many masses which appear malignant on CT/ MRI, turn out to be fungal/infective/tubercular. Deepak |
My Forum Posts
| Forum Posts | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Date  | Subject | Category | Hits |
| 04/02/2010 22:58:53 | Re:Just three and half year course to become MBBS Doctor ??? | Uncategorized and off-topic | 994 |
| 09/01/2010 23:29:41 | Dr Ravi Ramakantan's Blog | General Discussion (Residents) | 127 |
| 09/01/2010 22:48:22 | Re:I hate when Clinician Scribbles on my Report ! | General Discussion | 196 |
| 09/01/2010 22:38:49 | Re:USG REPORTING OF RENAL MICROLITHS | Ultrasound | 1379 |
| 09/01/2010 21:54:35 | Re:is DM radiology is worth trying for? | General Discussion | 453 |
Contact Information
| Panchkula | |
| Haryana | |
| India |
General
| MD DNB | |
| PGIMER Chandigarh | |
| Senior Resident |
Professional
| Govt Medical college Patiala | |
| IGMC Shimla | |
| Senior Residency PGIMER Chandigarh | |
| 3 years MD and 3 years Senior Residency | |
|
|
| Neuro Imaging, Interventional Radiology, Whole Body Imaging, Vascular Imaging | |
| PAPERS PUBLISHED
1. D Goyal, S Sharma, J Thakur, R Mahajan, J Negi, A Negi. Arachnoid Cyst Haemorrhage: A Serious Complication of Minor Head Trauma. Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging 2006; 16(2): 167-168. 2. S Sharma, D Goyal, A Negi, RG Sood, A Jhobta, M Surya. Dyke Davidoff Masson Syndrome. Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging 2006; 16(2): 165-166. 3. Dhiman D, Goyal D, Prakash S. Multiple Chloromas in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: An unusual finding on cranial CT. IJCP. 2004; 15(6): 54-5. 4. DS Dhiman, D Goyal, S Prakash, A Negi, S Sharma. Omental tuberculosis. Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging 2003; 13(4): 413-414. 5. S Sharma, A Jhobta, D Goyal, M Surya, Sumala, A Negi. Ureteral involvement in Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis- A Rare Manifestation. Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging 2006; 16(2): 243-245. 6. Garg MK, Galwa RP, Goyal D, Khandelwal N. Jejunal Gallstone Ileus: An Unusual Site of Gallstone Impaction. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008; May 17 [Epub ahead of print]. 7. S Sharma, R Mahajan, A Negi, D Goyal, N Prasher, A Jhobta. Atypical Peripheral Bronchial Carcinoid. Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging 2006; 16(2): 211-214. |
|
| Won 1st prize in REF Quiz 33rd block- Jan-Apr 2009 www.refindia.net
Won 2nd prize in REF Quiz 34th block- May July 2009 www.refindia.net |
|
| 1. Life member of Indian Radiologic and Imaging Association (IRIA).
2. Life member of Indian Society of Neuroradiology (ISNR). |
My Friends
Dr. Kulvinder Singh
Dr. Sunil Thomas
My Photos
Deepak Goyal has not uploaded any photos.
My Groups
| deepakgoyal_md@yahoo.co.in is member of 2 groups | ||||||
| Groupname | Members | Info | ||||
|
Discussion Contributors (Approval required) |
78 |  |
||||
|
Proud of My Institute (Private) |
277 | |
||||